Rules

Reformation Foosball

John 8:31-36

Jesus said, to some of the Jews who had believed in him, “If you continue in my word, you are truly my disciples and you will know the truth and the truth will make you free.” They said to him, “We are descendants of Abraham and have never been slaves to anyone. What do you mean by saying, ‘You will be made free’?”

Jesus answered them, “Everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not have a permanent place in the house, but the son has a place there forever. So, if the Son makes you free, you will be free, indeed.”


I found myself playing Foosball recently with one of my favorite 9 year-old boys, who shall remain nameless. (It’s questionably for pastors to invoke their own children as sermon illustrations, and even moreso where other peoples’ kids are concerned. So I will refrain.) Anyway, when he asked me if I played foosball, I gave him the same answer I give when someone asks me if I golf or play pool; something like, “I have played foosball, but I don’t play foosball.” Which really just means, I’m terrible at foosball – and golf and pool, for that matter.

But, since he’s one of my favorite 9 year-old boys, I agreed. And, first came the rules. And, since I’ve only played foosball, but don’t play foosball – and as with golf and pool, I’m usually holding a beer in one hand and a pool cue, golf club, or foosball rod in the other – I didn’t know the rules, didn’t think there were, really, rules to foosball, so was utterly at the mercy of my 9 year-old friend, who had LOTS of rules about how to play foosball.

I couldn’t keep track of them all at the time and can’t possibly remember them, now. But there was an “off-sides” rule somehow. And he seemed to have very official-sounding names for very particular offenses and penalties, like “tripping” I think. Maybe “tackling” was another. I was mystified by how little plastic figures, with immovable arms and legs, permanently attached to a metal rod could “trip” or “tackle” anything, but I was in no position of authority to argue with my 9-year old opponent. It was his table, his house, his rules, after all.

There was also a rule about whether my foosball players would, could, or should be upside down or right-side up at particular times. I think some of the foosball players could kick the ball backwards but others could not. I never did get to drop the ball back onto the playing field after a score, either – that was always his job. AND, of course, after I scored a time or two, my favorite 9 year-old seemed to suddenly remember more rules he’d forgotten to tell me about before we started. (I’m certain by the way, that he comes by all of this naturally. See, my favorite nine year-old’s father is a lawyer.)

But I played along, confident that I would and could and should win – no matter how many rules he threw at me – because he’s 9. But, as you might have guessed, I lost that freaking foosball game to my favorite 9 year-old.

And it makes me think about what we’re up to on Reformation Sunday: what Martin Luther was challenging in the Church of his day, and something like what Jesus meant when he talked about being a slave to sin, and about how we could be freed from that kind of bondage.

See, I think God’s people on the planet are called “children” for some very good reasons. Since the beginning of time, we’ve been pretending that the rules can save us. So we’ve messed with the rules – creating our own and breaking God’s – in ways that work to our advantage, in ways that disadvantage others, and in ways that make winners and losers of God’s people. And I think, like my favorite 9 year-old, we’ve convinced ourselves that by fudging the rules, by bending the rules, by making up and massaging the rules for our benefit, by playing by the rules at all – we can come out on top; that we can win, in the end.

In other words, we have convinced ourselves that our best chance for salvation, our best chance at freedom, as Jesus says it this morning, our only hope for victory is wrapped up in the Law of God’s rules.

Which is what people were up to in the days of Martin Luther – back in the 16th Century. They were keeping score with rituals and rules and restrictions and riches. You could pay cash for salvation, by way of something called an Indulgence, for example. The church was acting like a bunch of children, convincing people they could buy their way out of purgatory and into heaven, for the right amount of money. People were told they could make a spiritual pilgrimage or visit a holy shrine to earn favor and forgiveness in God’s eyes. We call this “works righteousness” nowadays – the notion that we can behave our way into God’s good graces.

And all of this made Martin Luther sad. It made him angry. It made him want to change and reform so much of what was happening to God’s Church in the world.

And it wasn’t much different than what was going on in the days of Jesus, either. The followers of Jesus were screwing up even while he was still walking around on the planet. The Pharisees were pointing fingers, the Sadducees throwing stones, the Scribes were scribbling down their rules, and the disciples were doubting that the grace Jesus proclaimed, promised and embodied, could really be true. And the faithful were falling for it.

All of it was about who was right and who was wrong; who was earning God’s favor and who was reaping God’s judgment; who was playing by the rules and who wasn’t; and who may or may not win, in the end.

God’s children were under the impression that following the rules – keeping the Law, at all costs – was the only way to win… the only way to be free …the only way to be saved. And, like me against my favorite 9 year-old, people fell for it – people fall for it – all of the time, thinking they could out-smart it all by following the rules.

But like those people listening to Jesus in this morning’s Gospel, we forget, don’t we? We forget that we have been – and are, still – slaves to Sin, slaves to the rules, slaves to the Law. And as slaves, like our confession reminds us, we cannot free ourselves. There is no amount of rules to follow… there is no correct Law to abide… there is no way, even, to tweak or twist the rules or the Law so that it leads to our victory.

Because we need more than the Law. We need the Son. We need the grace of a God, who isn’t keeping score; who isn’t dangling the rules before us like a carrot; who isn’t twisting the rules so that we’ll keep playing at this thing called FAITH, as though it were a to-do list for some cosmic task-master, rather than a grateful response to a generous God, which our faith is meant to be. We need the grace of a God who already loves us – and who always, always, always will – because we are, indeed, children of God. Nothing more and nothing less.

See, I imagine God watching all of us children – you and me and all of creation, I mean – like my favorite 9 year-old’s parents watched him kick my butt at the foosball table. Smiling and laughing. Not at all surprised. All of us knowing it was never about the rules or the score or the winning or the losing, anyway.

All that matters – God knows, and wants us to believe – is that we’re all set free, each and every one of us. That we all win, in the end. That God holds no grudges – and neither should we – until we learn to live differently and to love more radically and to hope more earnestly, and to play more fairly … for our own sake and for the sake of the world … thanks to the grace that belongs to each of us, that frees every one of us, that makes us all winners, in Jesus Christ, our Lord.

Amen

(…and for the record, I did Google “Foosball Rules” in preparation for this sermon and found nothing about “tripping,” “tackling,” or “off-sides.” And the rules I did learn about were not in my favorite 9 year-old’s repertoire, so I’m totally kicking that 9 year-old’s butt next we play.)

More Freedom from More Rules

Luke 14:1-14

On one occasion when Jesus was going to the house of a leader of the Pharisees to eat a meal on the sabbath, they were watching him closely. Just then, in front of him, there was a man who had dropsy. And Jesus asked the lawyers and Pharisees, “Is it lawful to cure people on the sabbath, or not?” But they were silent. So Jesus took him and healed him, and sent him away. Then he said to them, “If one of you has a child or an ox that has fallen into a well, will you not immediately pull it out on a sabbath day?” And they could not reply to this.

When he noticed how the guests chose the places of honor, he told them a parable. “When you are invited by someone to a wedding banquet, do not sit down at the place of honor, in case someone more distinguished than you has been invited by your host; and the host who invited both of you may come and say to you, ‘Give this person your place,’ and then in disgrace you would start to take the lowest place. But when you are invited, go and sit down at the lowest place, so that when your host comes, he may say to you, ‘Friend, move up higher’; then you will be honored in the presence of all who sit at the table with you. For all who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.” He said also to the one who had invited him, “When you give a luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, in case they may invite you in return, and you would be repaid. But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind. And you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you, for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous.”


Pastor Mark began his sermon last week with this idea of “telling a better story”, one of a wider mystery and grace than we may be used to. In the reading from last Sunday, Jesus healed a woman bent over for 18 years; and he broke the Sabbath laws to do it. Jesus breaks the Sabbath laws, Pastor Mark noted, in order to give witness to love beyond measure or reason; grace in excess to every expectation. I believe the exact phrasing used was: “To hell with the rules”.

Today’s reading is parallel to last week’s reading and also says “to hell with the rules”, particularly the rules governing ideas of status and honor.

In Luke 14 it is again the Sabbath day and here we find Jesus in the home of a Pharisee for a meal.

Now, this context of a meal is central to the deep meaning of the story, as we will see. Eating is about who is in and who was out.

Table etiquette and seating placement were very important in the ancient world in a way that likely does not fully resonate with us today. Who one ate with, whether one washed before eating, and where one sat at the meal were all social status markers. Hosting and Hospitality, then, was a way a person may gain prestige, and a meal may be expected to involve excessive eating and drinking, which is of course requires financial resources.

To be a guest, was to be acknowledged as a social equal, and we might be able to imagine the mutually reinforcing patterns of honoring between hosting a distinguished guest and being invited to dine by a distinguished host.

Though not as central to our culture, we do still have this link between seating and status.

Maybe some of you have been honored at a dinner, perhaps at your work, where they have invited all the important people in your company and seated you among them. Being seen in the presence of these important people gives you a certain degree of bragging rights among your collogues.

Or in contrast, perhaps some of you have been to a wedding and were assigned to a random table far from the Bride and Groom and thought, “Huh, so I mean so little to them?”, all the while noticing your other friends who are seated very close to the couple.

Or we have all seen one of those high school movies where the new kid accidentally sits at the “cool kids table” and gets mocked mercilessly. How dare this unknown kid presume to sit with us!]

Here, Jesus has been invited to sit with the “cool kids”, with the presidential VP’s, and share a meal at home of a leader of the Pharisees, the [third?] such meal recorded in Luke’s Gospel. This would have been quite a distinguished invitation, though it will be the last invitation as far as the gospel is concerned and we can understand why.

Jesus, for his part, is a pretty ill-mannered guest. He almost immediate breaks the Sabbath laws, in the very home of a teacher and strict keeper of the law!

The timing here on the Sabbath day should again set off little “warning bells” as we hear it – Pastor Mark mentioned last week that if Jesus had healed the woman bent over on a Tuesday, it would have been no less meaningful for her. No less a miracle.

But, by choosing to set her free from her bondage on the Sabbath, a day not only associated with a day of rest but with the Sabbath year of Jubilee, that joyous fiftieth year when all debts are expunged, land lost through debt or hardship returned to their ancestorial families, and Hebrew slaves freed.

The Jubilee legislation in Leviticus is explicitly economic, not merely spiritual. It was intended to ensure that there was no permanent underclass in Israel’s society.

Jesus, by continually linking his healing and teaching ministry to the Sabbath, is signaling that his ministry is liberative, and life giving, in the greatest sense of that term. Like the Jubilee year, Jesus is breaking all of the typical patterns and rules.

So again, as in last week’s reading, Jesus heals a person on the Sabbath, this time a man suffering from dropsy, an ailment related to sever swelling and fluid retention. This act of radical graciousness breaks the accepted rules of behavior, particularly rules governing relations between hosts and guests.

This act of generous rule-breaking should help frame our interpretation of the parables Jesus goes onto tell.

After sending the healed man away, Jesus looks around and sees the other guests maneuvering for the best seat.:

To the guests Jesus says, “At a Wedding banquet, do not take the most honored place. Otherwise, you might be shamed and embarrassed if the host asks you to move—if the cool kids mock you mercilessly—Instead, take the lowest place, so that you will be singled out when the host asks for you to move to a better place. For the exalted will be humbled and the humble exalted.”

Now, Jesus is not merely offering shrewd advice about how to gain more honor at table. He is not saying “I see y’all playing the status game, let me tell you how to play it better.” As in last week’s sermon, there is something deeper going on here.

A clue is in his interpretation of the meaning of the parable: “Those who humble themselves will be exalted”. A similar phrase to this had just been used in Luke 13:30. After healing the woman who has been bent over for 18 years, Jesus goes about teaching how to be saved: he concludes his teaching by saying “Then people will come from east and west, from North and south, and will eat in the Kingdom of God. Indeed, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last.”

In both Luke 13 and Luke 14 we have parables about eating and in both of these parables the humble and the last are the ones who are raised up, the ones who are honored.

Jesus is not offering advice on how to play the status game better, how to get to eat with the cool kids. It is a damming critique of all of their maneuvering and status games. Jesus is, instead, offering a lesson in humility.

Contrary to his fellow guests’ expectations, it is not the one who seeks honor who will find it. Instead, it will be those like the widow who was bent over. It will be those like the man suffering from dropsy whom he just healed in their presence. All of their social striving, to paraphrase Ecclesiastes, is vanity, and a striving after wind. Real honor is found in humility, and humility defines the character of God’s gracious, liberating, and rule-breaking Kingdom.

With this parable, Jesus not only rudely broken the law in another’s house – disregarding established patterns of hospitality and Sabbath keeping – but he has also then critiqued all of his fellow guests. But he is not done!

THEN, Jesus goes onto critique his host’s guest list.

To his host – a leader of the Pharisees, one of the elite – Jesus says, “When you hold a meal, do not invite anyone that is able to repay the invitation, such as rich friends or neighbors – basically, all those who are here with us – Instead, invite those who will be unable to repay you, such as the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind. Then you will be blessed”

Remember that I mentioned that to invite someone to a meal was to acknowledge someone as a social equal, though as the musical chairs of the other guests shows, there were greater and lower degrees of “social equality.”

If hosting was one way to gain social status, then the higher the status of your guests, the more social status you earn. And this social status will be enhanced and solidified when they, in return, host you for a meal. We again have this mutually reinforcing pattern.

Jesus’ parable brings this whole socially exclusionary pattern to a halt. Not only should the distinguished host invite those that are significantly below him in social status, he should do it because it does not benefit him. They are people who will not be able to repay him, that cannot help him play the social status game.

If eating is about who is in and who was out, then – turning all typical social rule of behavior upside-down -- “the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind” (14:13) are definitely in.

If this list seems familiar coming from Jesus’ mouth, it should. It echoes Jesus’ first sermon in his hometown of Nazareth, when he reads from the scroll of Isaiah where it says:

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,

Because he has anointed me

To bring good news to the poor.

He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives

And recovery of sight to the blind,

To let the oppressed go free,

To proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor” (4:18-19).

This, he announcing, rolling up the scroll, has been fulfilled in your hearing.

The year of the Lord’s favor another way of referring to this idea of the Sabbath year of Jubilee: the erasing of debts, returning of land, and freeing of Hebrew slaves.

So we here in our reading have Jesus, on another Sabbath, again breaking and critiquing all the rules. And his rule-breaking is in service of the socially undesirable, the economically oppressed, the religiously suspect, the physically burdened.

His Sabbath rule-breaking, bad-guest behavior gives us a glimpse of this wildly inclusive vision of the Kingdom of God.

Blessedness, the second parable concludes, is to be a blessing to others, especially “others” on the margins, drawing near to those whom society has pushed out. This is one way we participate in the coming of the Kingdom of God, a vision of the year of the Lord’s favor - by physically and monetarily, individually and systemically, inviting in and being changed by those oppressed by racism, sexism, homophobia, nationalism; by freeing those burdened, ground under, forgotten, and rejected by our economy.

True blessedness is being a blessing to others; true honor is found in humility. And true Sabbath, is found in breaking all the rule necessary to allow everyone to eat at the table of the Kingdom of God.

Amen