wealth

Dying to be a Success

John 12:20-33

Now among those who went up to worship at the festival [of the Passover] were some Greeks. They came to Philip, who was from Bethsaida in Galilee, and said to him, "Sir, we wish to see Jesus." Philip went and told Andrew; then Andrew and Philip went and told Jesus. 

Jesus answered them, "The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. Very truly, I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. Those who love their life lose it, and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life. Whoever serves me must follow me, and where I am, there will my servant be also. Whoever serves me, the Father will honor. 

"Now my soul is troubled. And what should I say--"Father, save me from this hour'? No, it is for this reason that I have come to this hour. Father, glorify your name." 

Then a voice came from heaven, "I have glorified it, and I will glorify it again." The crowd standing there heard it and said that it was thunder. Others said, "An angel has spoken to him." 

Jesus answered, "This voice has come for your sake, not for mine. Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be driven out. And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself." He said this to indicate the kind of death he was to die.


Once again the schedule of worship texts has us jumping around, so that today’s gospel story actually takes place following a couple familiar stories which we’ll hear during Holy Week. First, there’s the account of Mary (the sister of Martha and Lazarus) anointing Jesus’ feet with oil; at which point Jesus took the opportunity to tell his disciples that he will not always be with them. That is followed by Jesus’ entry to Jerusalem; which brought great crowds primarily because the story of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead had spread throughout the lands. Looking out at the crowds waving palm branches, the Pharisees said to one another, “It’s out of control; the world’s in a stampede after him” (Eugene Peterson, The Message).

Today we learn that some Greeks were among those who had come to see Jesus. These Greeks request an audience with Jesus. While the text does not elaborate on who exactly these Greeks are, the fact that they are referred to by their ethno-nationality is important. It tells us that the Jesus wave had crashed over onto the cosmopolitan culture of the Greeks. You know you’ve made it when the Greeks show up.

And so Jesus says that his time has come.

Previously in John’s gospel account Jesus has said, “It is not yet time.” Like at the wedding in Cana when he turns water into wine (John 2) or when he accompanies his brothers to the Festival of Booths and nearly starts a riot (John 7). 

But now the time has come. And what’s different about this time? The Greeks; they have shown up and present the possibility of cultural influence, wealth, and power.

Imagine it like this: you write a story and share it with your friends. They enjoyed it and shared it with their friends, who shared it with their friends, until it reaches the desk of Steven Spielberg, who, naturally, loves it and hops on a plan bound for Indianapolis to find you.

The arrival of the Greeks is like Steven Spielberg knocking on your door saying, “I want to make a movie based on your story; I want to make you rich and famous.” It is the cultural stamp of approval; the proof that Jesus “made it” in the world; the indication that the Jesus movement was going viral. 

When Jesus learns that even the Greeks want to cozy up to him, he responds by saying, “The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified.”

Except, that doesn’t mean what we think it means. 

Being glorified means something completely different to Jesus than it did to the Greeks. 

Jesus could not have cared less about the cultural markers of success of his day (which are not very different from today) because Jesus wasn’t playing the same game as everyone else. His goal was not to become a billionaire or a Hollywood success story. He had no desire to trend on social media; nor to partner with or benefit from the powerful and influential cultures of his day. 

The glorification of the Son of Man is not measured in awards, endorsements, legions of fans, tons of money, a key to society’s inner circle, or even the size of a Christian congregation today. Rather, the glorification of the Son of Man will come in death, like what happens when a single grain of wheat falls to the earth only to give life to new sprouts of wheat. These sprouts will mature and drop dozens more seeds into the ground, which in turn multiply new sprouts and new seeds.

Jesus rejects the cultural and religious claims to power; instead, he embraces death. In so doing, he offends the Greeks, the Jews, his own disciples, and anyone else who had bought into the false promises of prosperity broadcast by the powers and principalities. 

Instead of becoming a part of the system of success, with its elite few carried on the shoulders of the masses; Jesus promises to drive out “the ruler of this world” and “draw all people to [him]self.” 

As always, you need to draw your own conclusions about how this story is relevant to your life. But here are some ideas.… 

We could stop striving for the world’s illusion of acceptance and affirmation. For example, the number of friends we have or “likes” we get on our social media posts have no correlation to our value. 

We could pause and evaluate whether we are contributing to a system of abundance for all people, or a system of accumulation of stuff for just ourselves. Could we be convinced that the increasing gap between the rich and poor is a spiritual issue?

We could allow our faith to send us out onto the dangerous front lines where our convictions intersect with injustice, willing to risk everything on behalf of others.

Last week the Vatican announced the canonization of Oscar Romero, who was an Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church in El Salvador. Archbishop Romero was a passionate and outspoken advocate for the poor and oppressed as well as a fierce proponent of nonviolent resistance. His theology and activism put him at odds with political and military leaders in his country, and at odds with the larger church, who thought his was too political.

On March 23, 1980 Archbishop Romero preached a message calling out human rights violations in his country and demanding soldiers end to the violence of El Salvador’s civil war. He said, “In the name of this suffering people, whose cries rise to heaven each day more tumultuous, I beseech you, I beg you, I order you, in the name of God, stop the repression.”

One day later, while celebrating mass at a hospital, Archbishop Romero was shot and killed by a death squad. 

Mural of Oscar Romero in El Salvador.

Mural of Oscar Romero in El Salvador.

He almost assuredly knew that his path would lead to his death, as he drew inspiration from his close friend Jesuit Father Rutilio Grande, who was also assassinated for his own work seeking justice for the poor in El Salvador in three yeas earlier. Certainly both men drew inspiration from another man who also suffered for his fierce advocacy on behalf of the vulnerable as well as his pointed antagonisms against the powers of his day. That man, of course is Jesus.

Faith in Christ must always be outwardly evident and counter-cultural. Jesus did not promise safety and security for those who would claim to follow him. Instead, we, with our beautiful churches and positions of social privilege, must be ready to give it all up on a moment’s notice. That’s the message of Jesus; it is strength disguised as weakness, and it is no wonder that even his closest followers turned on him. May we do better.

Amen.
 

"Bigger Barns and Weak Links" – Luke 12:13-21

Luke 12:13-21
(Contemporary English Version)

A man in a crowd said to Jesus, “Teacher, tell my brother to give me my share of what our father left us when he died.”

Jesus answered, “Who gave me the right to settle arguments between you and your brother?” Then he said to the crowd, “Don’t be greedy! Owning a lot of things won’t make your life safe.”

So Jesus told them this story:
A rich man’s farm produced a big crop, and he said to himself, "What can I do? I don’t have a place large enough to store everything.” Later, he said, “Now I know what I’ll do. I’ll tear down my barns and build bigger ones, where I can store all my grain and other goods. Then I’ll say to myself, ‘You have stored up enough good things to last for years to come. Live it up! Eat, drink, and enjoy yourself.’”

But God said to him, “You fool! Tonight you will die. Then who will get what you have stored up?”

“This is what happens to people who store up everything for themselves, but are poor in the sight of God.”


Grace, peace, and mercy to you from God our Father, from our Lord and Savior, Jesus the Christ, and the Holy Spirit who unites us in faith. Amen.

One of my favorite authors is Malcolm Gladwell

He is a journalist who takes complex and often-hidden realities about social structures and human thought and distills them into fascinating stories and revelations. His latest project is a podcast series called “Revisionist History” that can be downloaded for free through iTunes or his website. 

I would have loved to play his episode from July 20 called “My Little Hundred Million” in its entirety for you this morning because it is particularly insightful with regards to today’s gospel story; but I’ll do my best to give you the abridged version.

Gladwell tells the story of Hank Rowan, who, in the early ‘90s, gave $100 million to Glassboro State University – a tiny, almost bankrupt school in New Jersey to which he had no significant connection. This monumental gift ushered in a period of unprecedented large-scale giving to colleges and universities. What makes this story unique, however, is that almost all of the largest gifts to higher education since that time have gone to the richest colleges and universities such as Harvard and Stanford. Gladwell spends the episode examining why no other donors took Rowan’s example and also explores the ramifications of the richest American colleges and universities getting even richer.

What it boils down to, for Gladwell, is a contrast of two ideological systems: weak link systems (think soccer) and strong link systems (think basketball). 

In soccer, the worst player on the team can do more damage to the team than a superstar could make up for. The team is very dependent on one another. Therefore, in soccer, upgrading the weakest players on your team instead of finding even-better superstars will result in more goals for the team.

Contrast that with basketball, which is superstar-driven. In basketball, paying for the superstar is worthwhile because one person can dominate on behalf of the team. The right superstar can overcome a handful of weaker teammates. 

Here’s a brief clip to explain a bit more…

Gladwell goes on to provide more examples of how strong link theory dominates our world – particularly in regards to education – but how in reality the weak link argument is often the approach that would make the most difference. 

When the ultra-rich donate to ultra-rich schools like Stanford, Princeton, or Harvard (schools whose endowments virtually guarantee their perpetual existence even if they would not charge any tuition ever again), that money accomplishes far less than it would have if it were given to a poorer school that would open up opportunities for more students. As a nation, we would all benefit more from the lifting-up of the bottom than we would from a handful of elite students getting an even better education at an elite school.

I’m obviously glossing over a lot of other information and I do encourage you to listen to this podcast episode in its entirety sometime soon. But for our purposes here this morning I hope this information provides a set of lenses through which you can look at today’s gospel story.

In this story as told by Luke, Jesus is asked to settle a financial dispute between brothers fighting over their inheritance from their deceased father.

Instead of stepping in to the middle of the argument or choosing a side, Jesus tells a story about a rich farmer (and trust me, as someone who was raised in rural Ohio, I know how much of an oxymoron the title “rich farmer” is).

The rich farmer had another bumper crop and asks himself this question, “How can I make room for all of my stuff?” The farmer decided to tear down his barn and make a bigger one – an investment in the future which absolves him from any hard work or responsibility from that day forward. Instead, he’s going to “Live it up!”

Then God comes in with the bad news: “You fool! Tonight you will die. Then who will get all your stuff?" God doesn’t provide an answer to that question, but it’s safe to assume in this scenario that the people who will get the rich farmer’s stuff are the people whom he should have been generously sharing with all along.

The rich farmer building the bigger and bigger barns is a strong link thinker. In fact, the rich farmer represents the end game of strong-link theory. His primary goal is the accumulation of more and more. The stuff he accumulates has only one purpose – to keep him fed and usher in age of freedom from responsibility from work or responsibility to care for others. That is how you win the game if you are playing for only yourself.

But according to Jesus, this is not how his followers play the game because no one wins at the game of life. Death will come to us all. No amount of hoarding and accumulating will truly allow us to live forever. As long as we have the faculties to do so, we will never be free from the responsibility to work or the responsibility to care for others

Bigger barns have one purpose – to consolidate resources and power. And there are any number of ways we try to justify this power grab. We claim, “I earned it” or “I’m the only one who can be trusted with all this” or “God has blessed me with this.”

Jesus tells a story in which a successful man was driven by greed, a desire for power, and a life of ease apart from anyone else. This man will die and everything he withheld from others will end up going to them anyways. “This is what happens to people who store up everything for themselves, but are poor in the sight of God.”

After reading this story from Luke, it is clear to me that the benefits to weak-link theory are not solely financial or social, but are also moral and spiritual. The accumulation and consolidation of wealth at the expense of others is a character trait of a fool and it leads to isolation from God and one’s neighbors. God’s blessings are intended to be shared so that the weak among us can be made strong.

This is a story told to remind us of a greater story… 

– a story that show us we are better when all people have equal rights, opportunities, and access;
– a story demonstrating the power of generosity;
– a story demonstrating the evil of greed;
– a story reminding us that in order for our generosity to do the most good, it has to be cast wide into as many lives as possible;
– a story reminding us that our value to directly tied to those who are the poorest and most in need in our society.

There is a good chance that none of us will ever be in a position to give 100 million dollars to a university; but each day we are all presented with numerous ways to be generous in sacrificial ways that will strengthen the weak links in our society. May our eyes, hearts, and hands be opened to these opportunities, in the name of Jesus Christ who alone liberates us from sin and the power of death.

Amen.