Adam & Eve

The Primeval Mythology of Genesis - The Fall

Genesis 3:8-24

They heard the sound of the Lord God walking in the garden at the time of the evening breeze, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden.

But the Lord God called to the man and said to him, “Where are you?” He said, “I heard the sound of you in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself.” He said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?”

The man said, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit from the tree, and I ate.” Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this that you have done?” The woman said, “The serpent tricked me, and I ate.” The Lord God said to the serpent,

“Because you have done this, cursed are you among all animals and among all wild creatures; upon your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. I will put enmity between you and the woman and between your offspring and hers; he will strike your head, and you will strike his heel.”

To the woman he said,

“I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.”

And to the man he said,

“Because you have listened to the voice of your wife and have eaten of the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground because of you; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life; thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you; and you shall eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; you are dust, and to dust you shall return.”

The man named his wife Eve because she was the mother of all living. And the Lord God made garments of skins for the man and for his wife and clothed them.

Then the Lord God said, “See, the humans have become like one of us, knowing good and evil, and now they might reach out their hands and take also from the tree of life and eat and live forever”— therefore the Lord God sent them forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from which they were taken.

He drove out the humans, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a sword flaming and turning to guard the way to the tree of life.


If ever there was a story in the Bible that has been misunderstood, misused, and abused, it is this one. The story of Adam and Eve, and their leave from Eden, is what many have used to justify patriarchy and the subjugation of women, the explanation and origin of evil, sin, and death in the world, and why sex has long been treated as something shameful and dangerous.

We come to these beliefs and practices by believing that there really were two people named Adam and Eve. And a serpent, who is clearly Satan, tricked the gullible Eve into eating the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Eve, being the temptress that she was, lured her husband into sampling the fruit, too. Suddenly, they realized they were naked, filled with shame, and ran to hide themselves with fig leaf loincloths. Then God shows up, gets them to confess to their sin, and punishes them both with painful labor: one in childbirth and the other in trying to bring life from the ground, and of course getting pushed out of paradise forever.

And now, every person after can blame Adam, but mostly Eve, for bringing sin and death into the world.

All from taking a bite of an apple…

But what if we don’t have to believe all of those things? What if the text itself doesn’t really support any of that? What if there are a lot more ways to understand the story of our mythical first parents and what it might mean for us today? And more importantly what it tells us about God our Creator.

So first things first - there was no apple. The text just says fruit. What kind of fruit, we don’t know. But I am pretty sure it wasn’t an apple, no matter what popular paintings portray.

Now to something more serious. Did Adam and Eve exist? Two individual people in a perfect garden, from whom the whole human race descended? No—probably not. The archaeological, historical, and especially genetic evidence just doesn’t support that reading.

And that’s where a lot of people start to worry. If that part of the Bible isn’t literally true, then what about the rest? If Adam and Eve weren’t real people—if this is a story rather than a historical event—then how can we trust the Gospels? Or the cross? Or anything else?

That fear is what one theologian called “house of cards theology.” If one part of the story feels shaky, then the whole thing must come crashing down. But that’s a fragile way to approach Scripture. It leads to an anxious, defensive kind of faith—one that clings to literal readings and misses deeper truths.

Yet we must remember, not only when we are looking at these stories in Genesis but throughout the Bible, God doesn’t only desire knowledge, but faith. And faith involves mystery, not certainty.

As for an origin story, this is a sort of an origin, but not one about evil, sin, and death.

Nowhere in the text is the serpent called Satan. Genesis 3:1 says, “The serpent was more crafty than any other wild animal the Lord God had made,” suggesting it too is an animal, created by God. If anything, based on what we know from the previous two chapters of Genesis, all of creation created by God, is good.

What that means for this crafty serpent, I am not sure. Perhaps this is where we lean into God saying that creation was good, not perfect. Perhaps the serpent was good, not perfect, but also not evil. Could it be that even in a good creation, not everything was meant to be simple or safe?

As for death, what rings in our ears is Paul saying, “the wages of sin is death.” So we often assume Adam and Eve were created immortal, and that because they sinned, now we all suffer the consequences—one of them being death.

However, the question of Adam and Eve being created immortal remains open and unclear.

If anything, God’s words in verse 22 suggest something different: “If they eat from the tree of life, they will live forever”—which implies they wouldn’t otherwise.In other words, part of being a creature is death. It is part of the created order. But if the serpent wasn’t Satan, and death wasn’t a punishment, then what about sin?

Sin is certainly central to the story, no doubt. But not sin in the abstract. This is the first instance of sin, so an origin story in that way. Yet the way we often hear this is that because Eve ate the forbidden fruit, all humanity after her is cursed—sin passed down like a hereditary disease.

But such a reading seems a little unfair to Eve and to us.

Afterall, Adam was there with Eve the whole time she was talking with the snake! [pic 3] It says so right in v. 6. He wasn’t off gathering other fruit. He stood silent, passive, seemingly unengaged from what was happening right in front of him. Eve on the other hand, though she is labeled and seen as a temptress, she is anything but.

Really, it is Eve who takes initiative. She rebuffs the serpent when it doesn’t tell the full truth. She makes decisions and is bold. All things we praise men for being, but not Eve. She doesn’t need to act as a temptress because she was clearly already in control. She handed Adam the fruit and he ate, no questions asked. No protest. No discernment. Just silence. Perhaps if Adam had been as engaged and discerning as Eve, we wouldn’t be in this mess.

So if there is blame, it is squarely on both. For not only were they equal in creation, they were equal in sin, too. And just so it’s stated, the story, not before eating the fruit and not after, does not call for men’s dominion over women. As one writer puts it, v. 16 “is not a mandate by God for male dominance but a description of the distortion that now marks human relationships.

A distortion brought by sin.

And what was the sin exactly? We’re told its disobedience - clearly they disobeyed God.

But disobedience is really the result of the actual sin at the heart of this story and the sin at center of our hearts, too. And that is mistrust.

Genesis 3 tells us that we live in a world where there are alternatives to God’s voice, in this case the serpent. And those voices tell half truths and lies that make us wonder if life could be better, we could be better if we just had that thing we are missing.

And we listen to those voices just enough that we begin to doubt not only ourselves, but God too. Creation is good, but not good enough. Perhaps it could be better. I am very good, according to God, but not good enough. Perhaps I could be better.

Maybe the snake is right, I am missing something. And once you believe that, you no longer trust God. And with trust out the window, disobedience is sure to follow.

We all have listened to the talking snake that tells us half truths and lies. If you just had this one fruit, this missing piece, then life would be better. If only I were skinnier or bulkier, if only I had more money or were more successful, if only I had more sex, or a nicer car, or a bigger house, then life would be better. It’s the same voice behind every perfectly filtered photo on instagram, every hustle culture mantra, every ad promising transformation if we just buy, try, or become something more. And finally we could be whole; we could be like God!

But don’t listen to the snake, it's a damned liar, always has been!

No human, no creature has it all. We are good, not perfect, remember? And the tragedy, as one pastor put it, is when we become so obsessive at securing what we think is missing from our lives, we end up losing the garden that was really good from the start.

The good news in all of this is what the story tells us about God our Creator.

Even though Adam and Eve listened to the snake, mistrusted God, and disobeyed, God still clothed them; meaning from the start God has never desired for us to walk around in shame or guilt. God has always desired to cover that for us. Whether it was leather garments for Adam and Eve, or the grace of Jesus Christ that now clothes us in baptism.

God, the perfect Creator, is always covering us with forgiveness and grace, even in our mistrust. Amen.


G2A #2: "The Blame Game" – Genesis 3-9

This week, guided by the stories of the first sin, the murder of Abel, and Noah’s Ark, we are exploring the transition from creation to disruption. These biblical episodes speak to some inherent truth about our human condition – that we constantly fail to reach our potential as children of God; that we are not quite who God has created us to be. The importance of these stories is not to pin down the origin of our inherent faults and failures to a particular time and place. Rather, these stories reveal some larger truths about God – namely that God is adaptable, merciful, and willing to sacrifice the unthinkable to demonstrate our worthiness as children of God.

One of the concepts that people have focused on throughout Judeo-Christian history is the question of “Who’s fault was it?” The first sin, that is. Who’s fault was it?

  • The serpent’s? After all, it was the serpent to gave voice to the temptation of eating the forbidden fruit.
  • Or perhaps the fault lies with God. Why would God place the fruit there to begin with? Surely God knew what would eventually happen.
  • The case could be made that it was the man’s fault. Can’t he think for himself? Is he so smitten with Eve that he would do anything she says?

Unfortunately, as we know all too well, it is Eve who has historically born the brunt of the blame. Men, who historically have been the ones who told the stories, wrote down the stories, and gave themselves the authority to interpret the stories, were (and many still are) in agreement that it was Eve’s fault. Some even go so far as to say that women still require a certain degree of contrition, humility, subservience, and powerlessness as punishment for Eve’s sin. In every church building and service around the world this needs to be acknowledged as wrong, abusive, and without religious merit.  

The point of the story is not about assessing blame. Rather, the point of the story is to allow it to teach something about the human condition we all share. I found the following quote from John Rollefson to be particularly helpful in this regard. He writes,

There is something wrong, something screwy, about us human beings at our core–not necessarily bad or evil, but amiss. It is not that the imago dei has been erased from our DNA but that deep within ourselves we are not fully what we are meant to be and, what is more, we know it. We sense that there is an estrangement from our essential, created selves that is rooted in our alienation from our Maker and gets expressed in behaviors that alienate us from one another.
— John Rollefson

The act of blaming others for our trials and tribulations is one of the most obvious expressions of our alienation from God and each other. We blame people when we live in fear. When an expensive vase is knocked over and broken, the young siblings point fingers at each other; distrust and anger form and contaminate their relationship. When the economy isn’t growing to the extent we’d like (or the extent a political party tells us it should be) we point fingers at each other; distrust and anger form and contaminate their ability to work together. When churches feel like they are slipping off the perch of privilege in a culture, they point fingers at anyone outside their walls (or inside, for that matter); distrust and anger form and contaminate their coexistence. Blame and fear go hand-in-hand.

To be clear, I don’t blame you for blaming others; nor can I pretend I do anything different. But we must remember that this tendency is obviously a symptom of sin, not a characteristic of God’s creation. Next time we point a finger at others, be it in the direction of a sibling, a political party, or to people outside our church walls; we must remember that this goes against our true identity as God’s creation.

Following the story of Adam and Eve, we hear of several other stories (two of which we heard today – Cain & Abel, and the Flood), which all follow a pattern established in the garden. There is a sinful action or pattern of behavior (A) that brings about a word from God (B), this word brings about a curse (C), followed by an act of mercy on God’s part (D).

Given the regularity that this pattern shows up in scripture, I am inclined to agree with the quote:

Clearly, it seems, the text portrays a God who has turned loose a species beyond divine control.
— Bert Marshall

God attempts every power-play we would ever conceive of in an effort to keep humankind on the straight and narrow: curses, infliction of emotional and physical pain, mass destruction. In these stories, God is acting out our deepest impulses when we feel wronged. And yet, each powerful rebuke and act of mercy only leads to a new set of problems.

How fortunate we are that God is not limited to our deepest impulses! How fortunate we are that God was willing to do the unthinkable in an effort to prove his profound love for us! For that is exactly what God does at the conclusion of the flood. Having, for all intents and purposes, destroyed and re-created the world, God resolves never to do it again. This is a remarkable promise.

God, in the midst of a unceasing pattern of destruction and starting over, chooses to give up something essential to God’s nature in order to demonstrate solidarity and love.

God’s fortunes are now bound up with those of humanity, as God is not simply committed but deeply invested in the fate of God’s creation.
— David Lose

This would not be the last time that God would relinquish absolute power in order to demonstrate solidarity and love. By sending his son, Jesus Christ, to reveal the truth of the Kingdom of God, God sacrificed not only the prerogative to destroy a sinful creation, but even more, God allowed himself to be destroyed by a sinful creation.

Through the lens of Jesus Christ we are able to look back at these early faith stories and see that the pattern established in those stories has been broken. God no longer threatens our sinful natures with acts of divine punishment and small tokens of mercy. Rather, God has entered fully into our sinful natures, suffered and was killed for it, and prevailed against it to unleash the ultimate of mercies –– citizenship in the kingdom of heaven. And with it, God has instructed us to lay down our own deepest impulses of blame, destruction, and self-righteousness and given us the ability to show mercy to all who sin against us.

Amen.

 

 

John Rollefson quote from Feasting on the Word, Year B, vol.3, p 102
Bert Marshall quote from Feasting on the Word, Year B, vol.3, p.101
David Lose quote from Feasting on the Word, Year B, vol.2, p.29